Mediatrice NIYONSABA | Qualitative Hypotheses | Best Paper Award

Posted on by ScienceFather

Mediatrice NIYONSABA | Qualitative Hypotheses | Best Paper Award

Mrs Mediatrice NIYONSABA, Rwanda Biomedical center, Rwanda

Mediatrice Niyonsaba is a dedicated health professional and researcher. Currently a second-year Master’s student in Epidemiology at the University of Rwanda, she holds a Bachelor’s degree in Anesthesia from the same institution. Since 2012, she has served as an anesthesia clinical officer at RBC/SAMU 🚑. Her research includes co-authoring a study on motorcycle crash epidemiology in Kigali and assisting in several projects, including those on anemia in trauma, substance abuse screening, and the impact of COVID-19 on CNS injuries. She is the lead author of a study on mHealth tools in prehospital care, published in the African Journal of Emergency Medicine 📚.

Publication profile

scupos

Education

Since November 2021, she have been pursuing a Master of Science in Epidemiology at the University of Rwanda’s College of Medicine and Health Sciences 📚. I previously earned a Bachelor’s degree in Anesthesia from the same university (2015-2017) 🎓. My professional journey includes working as an anesthesia clinical officer at RBC/SAMU (Service d’Aide Medicale d’Urgence) since November 2012 🏥. Before that, I taught Biology at SAKE Secondary School from January to November 2009 👩‍🏫.

Experience

Since January 2019, I’ve been part of the SAMU team collaborating with Utah University to develop and pilot test a mobile health communication tool (912 m Health tool) aimed at enhancing emergency medical services 🚑. I co-authored “Epidemiology and prehospital care of motorcycle crashes in Kigali, Rwanda,” published in November 2019 🏍️. From January to April 2020, I was a research assistant for the Kigali Anemia in Trauma and Transfusion Study at CHUK 🏥. Between August 2020 and September 2021, I assisted in adapting screening instruments for detecting alcohol and drug abuse in Rwanda using ACASI 🍷💊. In late 2021, I contributed to research on the impact of COVID-19 on CNS injury treatment and outcomes 🧠. Recently, I authored “Challenges and opportunities to improve efficiency and quality of prehospital emergency care using an m Health platform,” published in the African Journal of Emergency Medicine in September 2023 📚.

Research focus

Dr. Sharmistha Jayaraman’s research focuses primarily on improving prehospital emergency care and trauma management in low-resource settings, particularly in Rwanda. Her studies encompass various aspects of emergency medical services (EMS), including challenges in locating emergency scenes 🚑, enhancing efficiency through m Health platforms 📱, neurotrauma management 🧠, and the epidemiology of trauma, such as motorcycle crashes 🏍️. Additionally, Dr. Jayaraman investigates the initial management of traumatic brain injuries and factors influencing HIV testing among emergency patients. Her work aims to improve healthcare outcomes by addressing critical gaps in prehospital care and emergency response systems in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Publication top notes

Challenges Locating the Scene of Emergency: A Qualitative Study of the EMS System in Rwanda

Challenges and opportunities to improve efficiency and quality of prehospital emergency care using an mHealth platform: Qualitative study in Rwanda

Trends in Neurotrauma Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kigali, Rwanda

Factors associated with HIV testing among patients seeking emergent injury care in Kigali, Rwanda

The Initial Prehospital Management of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Kigali, Rwanda

The epidemiology and prehospital care of motorcycle crashes in a sub-Saharan African urban center

Data-driven prehospital training to decrease motorcycle crash deaths in a Sub-Saharan African urban center

 

Academic Hypothesis Advancement Award

Posted on by ScienceFather

Academic Hypothesis Advancement Award

Introduction:

Step into the realm of academic innovation and discovery with the Academic Hypothesis Advancement Award. This distinguished accolade celebrates the exceptional minds behind groundbreaking hypotheses that propel scholarly inquiry and drive progress in academia.

About the Award:

The Academic Hypothesis Advancement Award recognizes individuals who have demonstrated outstanding skill and insight in formulating hypotheses that contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge within their academic fields.

Eligibility:

  • Age Limits: None; open to individuals of all ages.
  • Qualification: Candidates must have a proven track record of formulating hypotheses that have made substantial contributions to their academic discipline.
  • Publications: Nominees should have a record of publishing their hypotheses and research findings in reputable academic journals or presenting them at conferences.
  • Requirements: Nominees must meet specific criteria outlined by the award committee.

Evaluation Criteria:

Candidates are evaluated based on the originality, significance, and impact of their hypotheses within their academic field. The clarity of hypothesis formulation, the strength of supporting evidence, and the potential for advancing scholarly understanding are key considerations.

Submission Guidelines:

Nomination packages should include a comprehensive biography highlighting the nominee's academic and research achievements, an abstract outlining the academic hypothesis and its implications, and supporting files such as publications, presentations, or research data. Submissions must adhere to the specified format and guidelines provided by the award committee.

Recognition:

Recipients of the Academic Hypothesis Advancement Award receive prestigious recognition for their contributions to advancing knowledge within academia, including media coverage, networking opportunities, and a formal presentation of the award.

Community Impact:

Winners of the award inspire and catalyze further research and scholarly inquiry within their academic discipline, fostering collaboration, dialogue, and the pursuit of new discoveries.

Research Hypothesis Excellence Award

Posted on by ScienceFather

Research Hypothesis Excellence Award

Introduction:

Step into the realm of research innovation and discovery with the Research Hypothesis Excellence Award. This prestigious honor celebrates the outstanding minds behind groundbreaking hypotheses that drive scientific inquiry and shape the future of knowledge.

About the Award:

The Research Hypothesis Excellence Award recognizes individuals who have demonstrated exceptional skill and insight in formulating hypotheses that advance our understanding of the world. It celebrates the critical role of hypotheses in driving forward the frontiers of research and discovery.

Eligibility:

  • Age Limits: None; open to individuals of all ages.
  • Qualification: Candidates must have a proven track record of formulating hypotheses that have made significant contributions to their field of study.
  • Publications: Nominees should have a record of publishing their hypotheses and research findings in reputable academic journals.
  • Requirements: Nominees must meet specific criteria outlined by the award committee.

Evaluation Criteria:

Candidates are evaluated based on the originality, significance, and impact of their hypotheses. The clarity of hypothesis formulation, strength of supporting evidence, and potential for advancing knowledge are key considerations.

Submission Guidelines:

Nomination packages should include a comprehensive biography highlighting the nominee's academic and research achievements, an abstract outlining the research hypothesis and its implications, and supporting files such as publications, presentations, or research data. Submissions must adhere to the specified format and guidelines provided by the award committee.

Recognition:

Recipients of the Research Hypothesis Excellence Award receive prestigious recognition for their contributions to advancing scientific knowledge, including media coverage, networking opportunities, and a formal presentation of the award.

Community Impact:

Winners of the award inspire and catalyze further research and innovation within their respective fields, fostering collaboration, dialogue, and the pursuit of new discoveries.

Cutting-edge Hypothesis Honor Award

Posted on by ScienceFather

Cutting-edge Hypothesis Honor Award

Introduction:

Welcome to the Cutting-edge Hypothesis Honor Award—an accolade dedicated to honoring researchers who dare to explore new frontiers of knowledge with bold and innovative hypotheses.

About the Award:

The Cutting-edge Hypothesis Honor Award recognizes researchers who demonstrate exceptional creativity and vision in formulating hypotheses that challenge conventional wisdom and pave the way for groundbreaking discoveries.

Eligibility:

  • Age Limit: Open to researchers of all ages.
  • Qualification: Candidates must demonstrate a capacity for original thinking and hypothesis formulation.
  • Publications: Applicants should have a record of publications that reflect their innovative approach to research.
  • Requirements: Nominees must meet all submission criteria outlined in the guidelines.

Evaluation Criteria:

Submissions will be evaluated based on the novelty, significance, and potential impact of the proposed hypothesis. Additionally, feasibility, clarity of presentation, and potential for future research avenues may also be considered.

Submission Guidelines:

  • Submissions should include a clear and concise description of the hypothesis, along with any supporting evidence.
  • Nominees must adhere to the specified format and submission deadline.
  • Detailed guidelines are available on the official award website.

Recognition:

Recipients of the Cutting-edge Hypothesis Honor Award will receive recognition for their visionary thinking and potential to shape the future of their respective fields. This includes opportunities for collaboration, funding, and further exploration of their hypotheses.

Community Impact:

The award aims to inspire a culture of innovation and exploration within the research community. Recipients serve as role models, encouraging others to push the boundaries of knowledge and pursue bold hypotheses in their own work.

Biography:

Applicants are encouraged to provide a brief biography highlighting their research interests, academic background, and previous contributions to their field. This contextualizes their submission and underscores their capacity for hypothesis generation.

Abstract and Supporting Files:

Each submission must include a clear and compelling abstract summarizing the proposed hypothesis and its potential implications. Any supporting files, such as preliminary data or references, should be included to provide additional context and evidence for the hypothesis.